Riberalta, Bolivia —
Exomad Green has completed a major expansion of its Riberalta biochar facility by the end of the year, doubling its operational capacity and reinforcing its role in scaling high-quality carbon dioxide removal (CDR).
The expansion increases the facility from three to six pyrolysis lines, doubling annual CO₂ capture capacity from 60,000 to 120,000 tonnes, and biochar production from 25,000 to 50,000 tonnes per year. This milestone marks a significant step forward in Exomad Green’s growth strategy and long-term commitment to industrial-scale carbon removal.
In 2024, Exomad Green built and commissioned two facilities — Concepción and Riberalta. In 2025, the company focused on scaling both sites, successfully doubling capacity across each facility. This growth has generated meaningful local impact, including the creation of additional green jobs for communities surrounding the facilities.
Environmental benefits scale alongside operations. Exomad Green sources sustainable forestry residues that would otherwise be incinerated or left to decompose, avoiding uncontrolled emissions. These residues are converted into biochar through a controlled pyrolysis process, and 100% of the resulting biochar is donated to indigenous communities and local farmers to help restore degraded soils, improve agricultural resilience, and support long-term land stewardship.
To date, Exomad Green has captured close to 300,000 tonnes of CO₂, establishing itself as a leading contributor within the global CDR industry. The company currently operates two of the world’s largest biochar facilities and is developing a third site, whose first phase alone will include eight pyrolysis lines, positioning it to become the largest biochar facility globally once operational.
As Exomad Green continues to grow, its focus remains on delivering verified carbon removals while creating tangible environmental and social benefits for the regions in which it operates.
https://kritikeskazino.com had me thinking about how pyrolysis capacity numbers can sound abstract until you consider the residue supply chain behind them, and doubling from three to six lines means a lot more forestry waste has to be sourced consistently. The detail that 100% of the biochar goes to indigenous communities and local farmers is the part I keep coming back to, since carbon removal projects often gloss over where the end product actually ends up. Curious how they plan to keep that donation model going once the third site with eight lines comes online.
https://paysafecardcasinolist.com was open in another tab when the pyrolysis line count caught my attention, and going from three to six without adding a second site says a lot about how modular these facilities have become. The part that actually stuck with me was donating all the biochar to indigenous communities and local farmers rather than selling it, since that turns a carbon removal project into something with a direct agricultural payoff. I keep wondering whether that model holds up once a third site with eight lines comes online and the volumes get much larger.